| ||
Legislative Articles
CFA Policy and Guidance Statements
|
Use of the term animal "guardian" instead of ownerThe "guardian" issue has become prominent over the last few years and legislation to add this word to animal laws has now passed in several cities and the state of Rhode Island. The Cat Fanciers' Association, along with many other organizations, is concerned about the potential implications of this term in both animal related laws and in common usage. The "guardian" word as a replacement for owner is part of a campaign, led by In Defense of Animals, called "They Are Not Our Property - We Are Not Their Owners". IDA disavows the concept and language of animal ownership and seeks to "reconstruct the social and legal relationship between humans and animals". At its October 3, 2003 meeting the CFA Board of Directors unanimously approved an official CFA position statement as follows: I OWN my cat!! - CFA's statement concerning the "guardian" term: Others that have written letters or published statements in opposition to the use of "guardian" include the American Veterinary Medical Association, The American Kennel Club, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, National Animal Interest Alliance, the American Dog Owners Association, Responsible Pet Owners Alliance, TX, The Civil Justice Association of California, The California Veterinary Medical Association and the office of the Los Angeles City Attorney. |
|
Copyright © 1995-2004 The Cat Fanciers' Association, with the exception of the photographic images which are Copyright © by the individual photographers. Many people have contributed to this site. Answers to frequently asked questions may be found on our FAQ pages. Please send comments to cfa@cfa.org. |
||